tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19505042.post2664593864947299413..comments2024-01-29T06:02:39.583-08:00Comments on Suzanne's Bookshelf: Biblical schmiblicalSuzanne McCarthyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07033350578895908993noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19505042.post-73871641184063654942009-04-11T20:45:00.000-07:002009-04-11T20:45:00.000-07:00Yes, you are right. Much of science is interpretat...Yes, you are right. Much of science is interpretation also. No doubt about that. So what are we to believe? Hmm.Suzanne McCarthyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07033350578895908993noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19505042.post-33095380052048685462009-04-11T12:01:00.000-07:002009-04-11T12:01:00.000-07:00Suzanne, (Yes, I still read everything you write, ...Suzanne, <BR/><BR/>(Yes, I still read everything you write, and enjoy it all, but have anything useful to add to most of your stuff. I'm sorry for not commenting more. Also, I'm about 3x busier than I used to be.)<BR/><BR/>I love this post, and the heart that shows through it. Of course, I love almost everything you write. Thank you for continuing to weather the storms and produce such thought-provoking, accurate, convincing stuff. <BR/><BR/>And thank you for defining the value of real observations over biblical interpretations. Observation must guide interpretation, or we'll head down the path to madness. <BR/><BR/>I would offer the slight adjustment that much of science is also a presentation of interpretation. Where science directly observes things, we have to be thankful for the correction. Where science interprets, though, scientists can be every bit as religious as I was in my teens. It can be difficult to know exactly whose interpretation is more accurate in some places. <BR/><BR/>That said, I'm only a young earther about 1 day a month. ;-)<BR/><BR/>May the Lord blessKevin Knoxhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16788817477327510023noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19505042.post-69274111153580631502009-04-09T19:23:00.000-07:002009-04-09T19:23:00.000-07:00Ah, Sue. I love ya. (((hugs)))Rock on. :)Ah, Sue. I love ya. <BR/>(((hugs)))<BR/>Rock on. :)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19505042.post-34102096933996274322009-04-09T16:17:00.000-07:002009-04-09T16:17:00.000-07:00Sue, I took your post's title here for one at my b...Sue, I took your post's title here for one at my blog (but somehow another different post is automatically linking to this post - hmmm, I don't know why).J. K. Gaylehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07600312868663460988noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19505042.post-74199494352983380572009-04-09T09:34:00.000-07:002009-04-09T09:34:00.000-07:00I don't know!And I don't know why Christians fight...I don't know!<BR/><BR/>And I don't know why Christians fight over things they have no way to prove absolutely one way or another.believer333https://www.blogger.com/profile/03480546499577897857noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19505042.post-78891557371996281152009-04-09T08:23:00.000-07:002009-04-09T08:23:00.000-07:00Perhaps it is that a day to the Lord is like a tho...Perhaps it is that a day to the Lord is like a thousand years. :o)Linhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04723395060585207854noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19505042.post-16110997326161252512009-04-09T07:02:00.000-07:002009-04-09T07:02:00.000-07:00I accept the evidence that the universe is billion...I accept the evidence that the universe is billions of years old and my sis, who is also a believer, thinks it is less than 10,000. Obviously, we understand some verses differently.Donhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05247071840577399185noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19505042.post-40097910635405943692009-04-09T00:47:00.000-07:002009-04-09T00:47:00.000-07:00Agreed!But only an ultra-conservative would take t...Agreed!<BR/><BR/>But only an ultra-conservative would take the 'creationism' view as biblical. Its not the text that we elevate above what we now know, but what others (mostly idiots) say about that text. I don't think the average believer needs to explain Genesis 1 and 2 with something so silly as the Gap theory, that's a conservative, literalist thing to do.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com