tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19505042.post7601863642510002625..comments2024-01-29T06:02:39.583-08:00Comments on Suzanne's Bookshelf: refuting female superioritySuzanne McCarthyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07033350578895908993noreply@blogger.comBlogger11125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19505042.post-35344087677046209342023-09-21T04:08:01.382-07:002023-09-21T04:08:01.382-07:00Thanks for this nice article.
Thanks for this nice article.<br />safetotosite.prohttps://emailing.montpellier3m.fr/track.php?in=1379&out=https://safetotosite.pro/&ic=1852noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19505042.post-88342336528449682082023-09-21T04:07:41.702-07:002023-09-21T04:07:41.702-07:00This is very nice one and gives indepth informatio...This is very nice one and gives indepth information. casinositeguide.comhttps://emailing.montpellier3m.fr/track.php?in=1379&out=https://casinositeguide.com/&ic=1852noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19505042.post-29182837898760740342023-09-21T04:06:45.504-07:002023-09-21T04:06:45.504-07:00 I’ve definitely picked up something new from righ... I’ve definitely picked up something new from right here. casinosite.onehttps://emailing.montpellier3m.fr/track.php?in=1379&out=https://casinosite.one/&ic=1852noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19505042.post-49122781299767528432012-09-17T06:12:45.382-07:002012-09-17T06:12:45.382-07:00Having trouble leaving comment. Sorry for double ...Having trouble leaving comment. Sorry for double post.Julia Gwinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03474605353981446859noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19505042.post-86315039970466558702012-09-17T06:11:32.956-07:002012-09-17T06:11:32.956-07:002 thoughts, briefly, as this is an old thread:
1....2 thoughts, briefly, as this is an old thread:<br /><br />1. Genesis says Adam was WITH Eve when she fell. No one talks about it, but that strikes me as very significant. <br /><br />2. Man alone did not fulfill God's design of a creature in His image. The relation of man and woman together is necessary. Because God is echad and not a radical unity? Jesus said the Father is "greater." Does this mean superior? Or are we stuck in a sinful state that sees authority and power as superior in terms of threats to our own power (as in warfare).Julia Gwinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03474605353981446859noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19505042.post-29414122169270806392011-09-20T09:25:37.091-07:002011-09-20T09:25:37.091-07:00Hi all
Seems The Gospel Coalition is at it again ...Hi all<br /><br />Seems The Gospel Coalition is at it again today.<br /><br />“Can Jackie O Teach Us to Be Good Complementarians?”<br /><br />What???<br /><br />Here’s the link in case anyone cares to comment.<br />You never know who’s lurking and questioning this stuff. :-(<br /><br />http://thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/tgc/2011/09/20/can-jackie-o-teach-us-to-be-good-complementarians/?comments#comments<br /><br />Oh Yea - They have banned me from this site - I’ve gone thru three cyber names.<br />I’m running out of email addresses. ;-)A. Amos Lovehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13380832298820984354noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19505042.post-65921032303838839332011-09-17T02:08:53.403-07:002011-09-17T02:08:53.403-07:00I'm grateful for this post. It confirms some ...I'm grateful for this post. It confirms some of my thoughts on what Paul was saying in 1 Timothy 2:13-14Marg Mowczkohttp://www.newlife.id.aunoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19505042.post-55138107898338114512011-09-12T05:03:28.297-07:002011-09-12T05:03:28.297-07:00There really is no other way to read it based upon...There really is no other way to read it based upon what we know about the teaching in the Temple of Artemis AND the fact that we would have to admit that Jesus Christ's sacrifice on the Cross and the promised indwelling Holy Spirit was NOT enough for women to overcome deception. (Not to mention all the OT examples you gave)<br /><br />It simply boggles my mind how this "perpeturally deceived women" doctrine continues to be taught and bought by so many people. To what end? Why? It dishonors Jesus Christ and His sacrifice for believing women.Linhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04723395060585207854noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19505042.post-39871048892239611752011-09-10T12:50:11.898-07:002011-09-10T12:50:11.898-07:00Impossible. Impossible for me. I can’t keep up w...Impossible. Impossible for me. I can’t keep up with this stuff. I’m glad that there are those with intense passions and competence to untangle this stuff. Or try. I keep thinking of a random generator which generates random temptations until the generator gets a temptation to stick. If the temptation sticks to a male, then that temptation is sexualized as a male temptation by observers who see it stick. It’s the ‘male’ temptation. Is that temptation truly sexualized? No. Not really. It’s just the one temptation that stuck to one male. The random temptation generator generates temptations until it gets another temptation that sticks. This time, to a female. That temptation is sexualized for observers who infer that the temptation hit a generic female weakness. Is it? No. Not really. It’s just one temptation that stuck to one female. Male or female superior competencies and deficiencies may have some sort of weird ecological correlations. Or not. There are texts that strike me as sexist at face value. That’s my face. And my value. Like 1 Tim. 2:14. I’m thankful for Suzanne's second look. It’s hard-to-impossible for me to tell whether I’ve learned more about Timothy or myself? I don’t really know. I do know that almost everything I read in and about – 1 Tim. 2:14 – ends up feeling more like a thought-experiment than probable exegesis (again, I’m not competent). I end up starving to death in desire to have been there to know and feel the entire context. And to sit down with the author of 1 Tim. 2:14, and ask, “here is what I heard you say, is that what you meant?” Eternal questions. More questions than answers. ~ JimJimhttp://randomarrow.blogspot.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19505042.post-23841906543236317332011-09-06T10:10:00.688-07:002011-09-06T10:10:00.688-07:00The latter example you gave is how I read it, per ...The latter example you gave is how I read it, per the Kroegers. That is, Paul is repudiating a specific teaching from Ephesus that claimed Artemis of Ephesus and other women were to be over men.Donald Johnsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07904992652259586383noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19505042.post-43241656105732248472011-09-06T07:20:20.642-07:002011-09-06T07:20:20.642-07:00"An alternative reading for 1 Tim. 2:14, then..."An alternative reading for 1 Tim. 2:14, then, is that, instead of declaring female inferiority, it simply refutes female superiority."<br /><br />Good point. I always learn something when I come here -- thanks, Suzanne!diamondnellnoreply@blogger.com