Here is the article April linked to,
- Contrary to popular assumption, “developed” societies don’t necessarily treat women any better than developing nations. The education level and economic success of a society do not guarantee high status for women. According to an article by Tina Rosenberg, the sole determinant for women’s low social status is patriarchy. No matter how wealthy or educated a society is, if men are privileged women will suffer.
The issue offers some good news. There is something that helps: microlending to women. Women who are loaned small amounts of money (sometimes the equivalent of $20) not only dramatically improve their own lives but also those of their families and their communities. From a sheer economic standpoint, lending to women is more effective than lending to men: women feed and educate their children and employ others. Several profiles of women put flesh on those statistics, telling moving stories of how women who are financially empowered are able to radically change their health and the power dynamics within their families. (Want to offer a microloan to a woman? Go to kiva.org.
2 comments:
I have done micro-financing in Laos and Thailand. Women are by far the most reliable borrowers. However, even in our good intentions we must be careful that that the women's situation is truly improved. One project in Nepal, procured milk cows for women in order to 1. improve the families' economy and 2. to improve the children's diet. The impact was that the women cared for and milked the cows, increasing their already numerous work responsibilities. The men? They took all the milk to the market to sell, not leaving any for the children to drink. After they sold the milk, they spent the money drinking in the town.
Philip Payne writes a devastating 1 page critique of the ESV Study Bible in the latest Priscilla Papers Summer 2010.
He points out 27 departures from what they claim are their goals in dealing with texts on gender.
Post a Comment